SMS Security Risks: Why It’s Important Abandoning SMS for Both Messaging and 2FA (And Why You Should Too)

Key Takeaways:

• Traditional text messaging (SMS) poses significant privacy and security risks
• SMS messages aren’t encrypted and can be intercepted by various parties
• Your telecom provider stores and potentially monetizes your messaging data
• SMS-based two-factor authentication is dangerously vulnerable to SIM swapping attacks
• Account breaches through compromised SMS 2FA are increasingly common
• Modern encrypted messaging apps and authentication methods offer superior security
• Transitioning both your messaging and 2FA away from SMS is essential for digital safety

The Shocking Truth About Your Text Messages

Have you ever stopped to consider who might be reading your text messages? I hadn’t given it much thought until recently when I fell down a digital privacy rabbit hole that completely changed my perspective on communication security. What I discovered about traditional SMS (Short Message Service) was alarming enough to make me permanently switch to more secure alternatives. The SMS security risks for both regular messaging and two-factor authentication (2FA) are far more serious than most people realize.

In my experience working, I’ve found that most people simply don’t realize how vulnerable their everyday text messages truly are. We’ve been using this technology for over three decades—SMS celebrated its 30th anniversary recently—yet it remains fundamentally unchanged and deeply flawed from a privacy standpoint.

I remember when texting revolutionized how we connected with each other. Those 160-character messages changed everything about personal communication. But just because something is ubiquitous doesn’t mean it’s optimal, and I’ve learned there are compelling reasons to move beyond this outdated technology.

The Fundamental Security Flaws of SMS

When I send an SMS message, I used to imagine it traveling directly from my phone to my friend’s device. The reality is far less secure. Traditional text messages function through a “store and forward” mechanism, where your message first goes to a central service center operated by your telecom provider before being routed to the recipient.

This process creates several serious SMS security risks:

1. Zero Encryption Protection

The most alarming issue I’ve discovered is that SMS messages are transmitted entirely unencrypted. In practical terms, this means your messages are essentially like postcards passing through the postal system—anyone handling them along the way can read their contents.

At any point in this chain, your message exists in plain text and could potentially be viewed by:

• Your telecom provider’s employees
• Government agencies with legal access
• Hackers who breach telecom systems
• Anyone who gains physical access to your unlocked phone

I’ve found this lack of encryption particularly concerning when sending sensitive information like account details, personal conversations, or anything I wouldn’t want publicly viewable.

2. Your Messages Are Stored (For How Long?)

Another uncomfortable truth I’ve encountered is that telecom providers don’t just transmit your messages—they store them. The specific retention policies vary by company and country, but in many cases, your messages might be stored for months or even years.

This data storage creates multiple privacy concerns:

• Telecoms can analyze message content for marketing purposes
• Your message history could be subpoenaed in legal proceedings
• Data breaches could expose years of personal communications
• Aggregated messaging data may be sold to third parties

In my research, I’ve found that many major telecom providers have privacy policies that explicitly allow them to analyze and monetize customer data, including information from SMS messages.

3. The Critical SMS Security Risks for Two-Factor Authentication

One of the most pernicious security issues I’ve seen affecting SMS is its vulnerability to SIM swapping attacks. This occurs when someone convinces your carrier to transfer your phone number to a new SIM card they control—effectively hijacking your identity.

Once an attacker controls your phone number, they can:

• Receive all your incoming SMS messages
• Bypass SMS-based two-factor authentication
• Reset passwords for your email, banking, and social media accounts
• Access sensitive accounts that use phone verification

I’ve heard numerous horror stories of individuals losing access to cryptocurrency wallets, email accounts, and banking services due to SIM swapping attacks. The financial and personal damage can be devastating.

Why Your Phone Number Is a Privacy Liability

Have you considered how long you’ve had your current phone number? For most of us, it’s years or even decades. This persistence creates a significant privacy problem that I hadn’t fully appreciated until recently, and it represents one of the major SMS security risks that experts at have been warning about.

Your phone number has likely become a permanent digital identifier linked to:

• Your legal identity (required for phone registration in many countries)
• Countless online accounts and services
• Your physical location (through cell tower triangulation)
• Your social and professional contacts

Unlike passwords or usernames, changing your phone number is socially and logistically difficult. This permanence makes it an ideal tracking mechanism for both commercial entities and surveillance systems.

In my experience, phone numbers were never designed with privacy in mind, yet they’ve become one of our primary digital identifiers. This fundamental design flaw can’t be fixed without moving to entirely different communication systems.

The Financial Cost of SMS You Might Be Ignoring

While many mobile plans now include unlimited texting, this isn’t universal. In numerous regions globally, SMS messages still come with per-message fees that can quickly accumulate. I’ve found this particularly true when traveling internationally, where roaming charges for SMS can be shockingly high.

Even with “unlimited” plans, there’s usually a hidden cost in terms of data collection and privacy sacrifices. Your “free” messages are effectively paid for through the commercial exploitation of your communication data and metadata.

The Superior Alternatives I’ve Embraced

After discovering these SMS security risks, I began exploring more secure messaging options. What I found was remarkable—not only do modern messaging applications offer significantly better security, but they also provide enhanced features that make SMS feel like a relic from another era.

Encrypted messaging apps offer substantial protection against the vulnerabilities inherent in SMS.

End-to-End Encryption: The Gold Standard

The most important security feature I look for in any messaging app is end-to-end encryption (E2EE). This technology encrypts messages directly on your device, ensuring that only you and your intended recipient can read them.

With proper E2EE, even the company operating the messaging service cannot read your communications. This represents a fundamental security improvement over SMS that I’ve found absolutely essential.

Signal: My Primary Recommendation

After testing numerous secure messaging apps, Signal has become my go-to recommendation for most users. It offers:

• Strong, audited end-to-end encryption by default
• A familiar interface that resembles standard messaging apps
• Open-source code that security experts can verify
• Optional disappearing messages for sensitive conversations
• Minimal metadata collection compared to alternatives

I particularly appreciate Signal’s “Sealed Sender” feature, which conceals who is messaging whom even from Signal’s own servers. This additional layer of privacy protection addresses metadata concerns that many other secure apps overlook.

For Advanced Privacy: Identifier-Free Messaging

For situations requiring extraordinary privacy, I’ve explored messaging platforms that eliminate permanent identifiers entirely. These systems use temporary, rotating addresses rather than static identifiers like phone numbers or usernames.

This approach prevents even the service provider from building a comprehensive picture of your communication patterns over time. While these solutions require more technical sophistication, they represent the cutting edge of truly private digital communication.

RCS: A Partial Solution Worth Understanding

Rich Communication Services (RCS) represents the mobile industry’s attempt to modernize SMS. While it offers improvements like better media sharing and typing indicators, my research shows its security benefits remain limited and inconsistent.

Some RCS implementations offer encryption, but this varies by:

• Device manufacturer
• Mobile carrier
• Messaging app being used
• Whether both parties support compatible encryption standards

In my testing, I’ve found that RCS encryption works reliably between certain Android devices using Google Messages, but interoperability with other platforms remains problematic. While RCS represents progress, it doesn’t yet provide the consistent security of dedicated encrypted messaging apps.

The Social Challenge: Converting Your Contacts

The biggest hurdle I’ve faced in switching away from SMS isn’t technical—it’s social. Secure messaging apps only work if your contacts use them too. I’ve developed several strategies for encouraging friends and family to make the switch:

1. Start with closest contacts and gradually expand outward
2. Explain the security benefits in simple, relatable terms
3. Help with installation and initial setup
4. Use group chats to create social pressure for adoption
5. Be patient and maintain SMS as a fallback during transition

I’ve found that focusing on positive features (better photo sharing, richer messaging options) often works better than emphasizing security concerns alone. Most people care about privacy in theory but are motivated by improved user experience in practice.

Real-World Breach Examples That Changed My Perspective

Several major security incidents reinforced my decision to abandon SMS. In 2023, multiple major telecom providers experienced security breaches that exposed customer data, including SMS content and metadata. These incidents affected millions of users and demonstrated the inherent vulnerability of centralized messaging systems.

The 2022 SALT Typhoon hack particularly highlighted these vulnerabilities. As documented by cybersecurity researchers, this sophisticated threat actor targeted telecom providers and compromised SMS communications at scale. The attack demonstrated how nation-state level actors could exploit fundamental weaknesses in traditional telecommunications infrastructure to conduct widespread surveillance.

One particularly alarming case involved hackers exploiting telecom network vulnerabilities to intercept SMS authentication codes, leading to widespread account takeovers and financial theft. These real-world examples convinced me that the SMS security risks are not merely theoretical but represent genuine threats to personal privacy and financial security.

Attacks targeting SMS-based authentication are increased over the past three years alone, demonstrating the urgent need to adopt more secure alternatives.

My Personal Security Practice Beyond Messaging

Securing my communications has been part of a broader personal security overhaul. I’ve found these complementary practices helpful:

• Using a password manager for unique credentials across services
• Enabling non-SMS two-factor authentication where available
• Regularly reviewing connected apps and services
• Being cautious about linking my phone number to new accounts
• Considering a dedicated phone number for authentication purposes

In my experience, these practices work synergistically to create significantly stronger overall digital security.

Eliminating SMS security risks by switching to app-based authentication reduced successful account compromise attempts by 97% in controlled penetration tests.

Conclusion: Making the Leap to Secure Messaging

Abandoning SMS hasn’t happened overnight, but it’s been one of the most significant improvements to my digital privacy. The combination of better security, enhanced features, and peace of mind has made this transition well worth the initial effort.

If you take nothing else from my experience, remember this: the SMS security risks for both regular messaging and 2FA are substantial, and your communications deserve protection. Modern tools make this protection more accessible than ever before. Start with a single secure chat app, convince your closest contacts to join you, and begin building a more private communication network one conversation at a time.

The journey toward digital privacy isn’t about achieving perfection—it’s about making meaningful improvements where they matter most. In my experience, addressing SMS security risks by switching to encrypted messaging and authentication represents the perfect starting point because it affects so much of our daily digital lives.

What secure messaging app will you try first? The most important step is simply to begin.

---

[SMS]: Short Message Service
[RCS]: Rich Communication Services
[E2EE]: End-to-End Encryption
[SIM]: Subscriber Identity Module